Rajesh Gupta
Jammu, Aug 06: A complaint was filed by an applicant to CM & H&UDD Commissioner over illegal rejection of BP Case & on sleeping over by JDA on Notice under Section 50 of J&K Development of 1970, which was forwarded by H&UDD to VC, JDA for comments/report over the issue but strange Date was not written on Govt's Communication, in addition no copy to applicant, so that he/she may know the progress?
Thereafter, Secretary JDA, who is known for playing delay tactics & other matters related to after sleeping over the issue dated. 25th July communicated to H&UDD only with the documents forwarded by STP but he did not bother to read basis of complaint & without taking approval from VC, JDA, who also did not bother to read the contents of complaint over illegalities committed by Officer of JDA, simply forwarded to Commissioner/Secretary, H&UDD.
Other side, if applicant submitted Notice under Sec 50 in 2024 & VC does not treat himself as Government in the said case he should have forwarded it to Govt, who soever, otherwise JDA is the custodian of Master Plan & the matter pertains to faulty Master Plan, so was to be resolved by JDA, not by the Govt, if so, why application was put on hold in JDA for 02 years?
2ndly, complaint was on contradictory observations of 02 CTPs, what comments Secretary has given & if Bye Laws were not there, has JDA forwarded Govt for any addition/deletion are some more question on so called competent Secretary?
Above all it is to be seen, whether Secretary has followed the complaint paras & or his comments/report is as per complaint or just closed the matter but after how many days of Govt's communication needed to be verified.
|