Rajesh Gupta
JAMMU, Sep 27: Advocates Amandeep Singh , Dev Bhardwaj & Editor Rahil Gupta appeared for Cross Town News in case titled Rushal Garg vs Google LLC in Delhi Court.
Advocate Amandeep Singh, son of the Soil, is resident of Kathua , has been practising in Supreme Court and top Courts since 15 years.
Additional Senior Civil Judge cum JSCC cum G.Judge , Tis Hajari Court Delhi , Sh. Rinku Jain on 25th September odrerd that "
CS SCJ 1332/25 Rushal Garg Vs. Google LLC CNR no. DLCT03004425202525.09.2025
Present : Sh. Anshveer Singh Nalwa, Ld. Counsel for theplaintiff.Sh. Aditya Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffthrough VC.
Ms. Aishwarya Kane, Ld. Counsel for defendant No.1 through VC.Ms. Asavari Jain, Ld. Counsel for defendant No.1
.Sh. Navdeep Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant No.2
through VC.Sh. Amandeep Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendantNo.9 through VC. Editor in chief of defendant no.9 with Ld. Counsel Sh. Dev Bhardwaj.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant no.9.Same is taken on record.Summon sent to defendant no.10 received back withreport “refused”. Summonsent to defendants no.5 to 8 notreceived back.Affidavit u/s 63 (4) of Bhartiya SakshayaAdhiniyam, 2023 pertaining to the tracking report qua service upon defendants no.3 and 4 is already on record.As per the tracking report, defendants no.3 and 4have already been served.
Defendant no.10 is also deemed tohave been served.None has appeared on behalf of defendant no.3 & 4since morning. They were served on 31.07.2025 and 07.08.2025respectively. It appears that defendants no.3 & 4 are notinterested in pursuing the present case, hence, defendants no.3and 4 are proceeded against ex-parte.Contd….2/--2-It has been submitted on behalf of defendant no.2 &defendant no.9 that the online content sought to beremoved/deleted by way of the present suit w.r.t. defendants no.2 & 9 has already been removed/deleted.Ld.
Counsel for defendants no.2 & 9 undertake thatthe removed content shall not be re-posted/uploaded again on anyonline platform either by them or through theirattorneys/assignees/associates/agents etc.In view of the fact that the content qua defendantno.2 & defendant no.9 has already been removed/deleted, Ld.counsel for the plaintiff has submitted that no further reliefremains to be claimed against defendant no.2 & defendant no.9 and they be deleted from the array of parties.
Separate statement of editor in chief of defendantno.9 and Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has been recorded.
In view of the statements recorded and in view ofthe fact that the relief claimed against defendant no.2 &defendant no.9 stand satisfied, defendants no.2 & 9 stand deletedfrom the array of parties.Issue summons to defendants no.5 to 8 forsettlement of issues through all modes including electronicmodes on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post, returnable for the nextdate of hearing.Put up for further proceedings on 14.10.2025.
At request, summons be also given dasti.
|