Rajesh Gupta
Jammu, April 14: One applicant made a complaint to Lt Governor on 15th Dec 2025 following no actions taken on the facts of complaint & on STP & concerned by H&UDD despite LG's office No. dtd. 27.01.2023 followed by reminder dtd 28.03.2023 and dtd 14th May 2023 , which was again forwarded by LG Office to Commissioner/Secretary, H&UDD vide communication dtd. 18.12.2025.
However, one, said complaint may have directly forwarded to VC, JDA, so why, by showing incompetence of Secretary, who have officially by taking the responsibility of the show & to mislead the story communicated to Pr Private Secretary/Special Secretary to LG in ref to his No. PS/LG/2025/2665-R dated: 17.12.2025 by which he quoted representations of applicant dtd. 17.07.2024 & dtd. 06.10.2025 but had not gone through the basic issue of the said communications, raised questions on his such disposal.
Main issue of actions in representations quoted by Secretary, JDA, otherwise the issue revolved around a report, which was sought by then Pr Secretary, H&UDD over the some illegal rejection of BP Case by CTP, JDA, submitted by then VC, JDA vide No. JDA/CTP/000176/388 dtd 1.10.2022 in which VC had categorically mentioned that rejection of said BP case by then boss CTP of JDA was not as per terms & conditions mentioned in the Master Plan after seeking observations from CTP of Town Planning organization but later VC, himself put a different condition for rejection of same BP Case.
The issue also involved , who soever applied for legal BP Case, CTP of JDA put a query of "Proposed Road" but despite knowing the fact of other illegal constructions he closed his eyes, raised a pointer towards his integrity & working both?
If enquired, regarding the matter , had ever, present CTP, bothered to write to Govt for resolving said issue or for incorporating left over items of left over Building Bye Laws in Master Plan shall blast his self interests over the matter, which is causing harassment to general public for clearing of their genuine BP Cases.
However, one more question on present CTP is that one application stands submitted to VC, JDA in under Sec 50 of J&K Development Act of 1970 in 2024 over resolving issue of "Proposed Road" otherwise which was to be closed in 06 months after submission of said Notice but it was followed by reminders to VC, JDA over removing the term "Proposed Road" for their BP Case but in RTI reply the said so called competent CTP replied that the applicant should have submitted his application to Govt not to VC, raised proved case of malafidies against him, otherwise even thereafter, the boss Secretay & CTP should have acted to forwarded said application to Govt, if they don't consider VC JDA as Government ?
However, in reply to LG Office submitted by Secretary, JDA, vide letter dtd. 24th March 2026, with CTN speaks that, Secretary, without studying the issue, relied on the illegal facts provided by CTP, no doubts raised a pointer towards his working as well?
Another questions on Secretary being PIO, that till day he is unable to guide JDA officer/officials of JDA over replies in RTI in Sec 8(1)(b) , 8(1)(j) etc etc, which other side raised questions on working of Tehsildar, JDA & CTP for hiding genuine information in RTI but never acted upon for their proved negligence.
It is also to mention here that under COBO Act & J&K Development Act of 1970, JDA is Govt in sealing, demolition of buildings etc etc but in Set 50 of J&K Development Act of 1970 it said that JDA is not Govt, no doubts a matter of action on Secretary & CTP both.
However, observations of Secretary, JDA replied to LG Office by boss Secretary without going through communication of then VC JDA dtd. 1.10.2022 as below, addressed to then Pr Secretary H&UDD raised questions
 
|