Ankit Gupta
Jammu, Oct 26: VC,JDA, Rupesh Kumar, has sought detailed report from present DLM & Tehsildar over a simple & clear issue at 12 PM, Today on a file with draft over which 02 VCs & 03 DCs of Samba had clarified the issue over an issue of encroachment of 16 Marla land in demarcation of JDA & stands clarified by a commissions report including Revenue officers of JDA?
Above all, it is to mention here that then VC ,JDA, Rajesh Shavan after comments of then DC Samba vide letter , due to negligence of Revenue Officers of the time for seeking fresh Commission over decided issue, Shavan on the communication of DC Samba vide dtd10.08.2018 wrote DLM of the time vide no. PS/430 dtd 11.08.2018with the observations that" Now there is no need of commission, you should Clear the case/spot" as per the letter of DC and findings of Tehsildar Territorial" on the same communication from DC Samba, but after few days Shavan was transferred & DLM & his team slept over the issue. But competence and malafidies of Revenue wing can be seen again that vide No. JDA/DLM/HQA/2116-18 DTD. 25.10.2023 for constitution of Commission?
But, Thereafter applicant requested Div Com Jammu for proved case of "Woman Harassment" & Div Com communicated following reminders to boss DC & VCs of the time but as usual delay tactics were played again & Div Com finally after further request of applicant fired a tough letter to DC & VC & sought report over the issue by 3 PM on the same day:
However malafidies of DC Samba's reply were detected that he on the same day submitted the report by 3 PM but which was otherwise marked with back dated No. of around of 20 days following which, Div Com forwarded same detailed report to VC, JDA for immediate actions?
Now, just again to delay the settled issue, competence of JDA's Revenue Department started again as just to delay the clear cut case, one communication was written to Tehsildar Bari Brahmna to provide details of some other Khasra Numbers & another to Collector, PWD for seeking some details, wherein no details of any Khasra Number was mentioned raised some of malafidies for seeking details over a decided issue & latest report of DC Samba with full story of the case since year 2014?
By understanding the issue, VC on 22nd October called husband of applicant in his office, where DLM & Tehsildar were also called & whole case was discussed for around 30 minutes, where Revenue Officer, first said we have not seen the reports of DC Samba & VCs letter, which raised some questions on them as they themselves in ref to said letter communicated to Collector, PWD & Tehsildar, Bari by seeking some undesired reports, which are clear in DC s last detailed report?
But, Rupesh Kumar by understanding the issue, asked for some observations to Revenue Officer, which they could not reply properly, however they told VC that in report of Revenue Officers of Territorial forwarded by DC Samba has mentioned that plot is neither encroached in left, right or front but may in demarcation of JDA, OTHERWISE it should have mentioned that "IT IS" but VC turned down their said difference of "IT MAY" & "IT IS".
Following the discussions on long pending issue since more than 10 years in JDA due to negligence of Revenue Officers of JDA, VC JDA directed Revenue Officers of JDA on 26th Oct at 12 PM with complete details on Draft, so that it may be closed this way or the other.
However, it is to mention here that Div Com Jammu has again recently sought ATR from VC JDA over the final outcome of the issue, which is put on hold by only Revenue Officers, which is only being intentionally being delayed by so called most competent team of Revenue Officers who are creating doubts & not wanted to understand word "IT MAY"?
|