Jammu, May 8: Central Administrative Tribunal while hearing has held that suspension is not a punishment as it is neither punitive nor stigmatic and is generally done for fair inquiry.
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Member (J) Central Administrative Tribunal in a petition filed by Dr Vikas Gupta seeking quashment of Government Order dated 18.04.2024 whereby and by which he has been placed under suspension.
The applicant also prayed for direction to the respondents to allow him to perform his duties as Incharge Assistant Project Officer in the Directorate of Sheep Husbandry, Kashmir with additional charge of the post of Joint Director (Farms), Kashmir as was being performed by him before passing of the impugned order of suspension.
After hearing CAT observed thar in normal circumstances, suspension orders are not interfered by courts except when the same has been passed by an incompetent authority or it is in violation of relevant rules & in said case charge sheet has been issued vide memorandum dated 29.04.2024.
A perusal of the file as well as charge sheet shows that serious allegations of causing loss to exchequer has been leveled against the applicant. It is not the case of the applicant that the suspension order has been passed by an incompetent authority or it has been passed in violation of statute.
CAT said that the main argument advanced by the applicant is that the impugned suspension order is vindictive in nature in as much as the same has been issued for taking revenge against the applicant as in Contempt Petition No. 40 of 2024 filed by the applicant this Tribunal vide order dated 22.04.2024 attached the salary of Director General, Sheep Husbandry Department Kashmir.
It added that in my opinion though the timing of issuance of the impugned suspension order is intriguing, it is not a sufficient ground to stay the same. Even otherwise, interfering with the suspension order, when charge sheet has also been issued, would mean preventing the respondents from discharging their obligation to proceed in accordance with law.
Member Judicial added thar suspension is not a punishment as it is neither punitive nor stigmatic. It is generally done for fair inquiry & declined to grant any interim stay against the impugned suspension order.
|