New Delhi, Sept 11: The Supreme Court held today that Central Government officers of the level of Joint Secretary and above can be probed and prosecuted without prior nod of the authorities in corruption cases with retrospective effect from September 11, 2003.
A five-Judge Constitution bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, in an unanimous verdict, ruled that its 2014 verdict, which had struck down a provision of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 providing immunity to such officers in graft cases, will have retrospective effect.
The Apex court said that the 2014 judgement will come into effect from September 11, 2003 when section 6(A) of the DSPE Act, which pertained to approval of the Central Government to conduct inquiry or investigation, was inserted into the DSPE Act.
In its May 2014 judgement, the apex court had held as invalid the Section 6A(1) of the Act and observed that protection in section 6A has “propensity of shielding the corrupt”.
The Apex court delivered its verdict today on the issue of whether the striking down of the provision granting immunity would have a retrospective effect in view of rights protected under Article 20 of the Constitution. Article 20 of the Constitution provides for protection in respect of conviction for offences.
“ A bench, which also comprised Justices Sanjiv Khanna, A S Oka, Vikram Nath and J K Maheshwari added that Declaration made by the constitution bench (in May 2014) in the case of Subramanian Swamy will have retrospective operation. Section 6(A) of the DSPE Act is held to be not in force from the date of its insertion, that is September 11, 2003.
While pronouncing the verdict, Justice Nath said the bench has framed three questions to decide. “Whether section 6 (A) of the DSPE Act is part of procedure or it introduces a conviction or a sentence? Whether Article 20 (1) of the Constitution will have any bearing or relevance in the context of declaration of section 6 (A) of the DSPE Act as unconstitutional?
“The declaration of section 6 (A) of the DSPE Act as unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution would have a retrospective effect or would apply prospectively from the date of its declaration as unconstitutional?.
|