Cross Town News
Cross Town News India Follow Editor Rahil Gupta on   Twitter   Instagram

“Satake Lagao Item No 50” :: No proper implementation of RTI Act, PSGA of 2011 & CM’s grievance cell in Jammu & Kashmir


Cinosural International An Elementry School Jammu

“Satake Lagao Item No 50” No proper implementation of RTI Act, PSGA of 2011 & CM’s grievance cell in Jammu & Kashmir

JAMMU, Sep 02:  It is pertinent to mention here that lot of peoples had approached us regarding the hardships faced by then for getting NOC for their plans submitted for construction to the JMC. Municipal Bye Laws of 2011 clearly speaks that one has to issue NOC within a period of three weeks, otherwise it shall be treated as deemed NOC but the below information clearly speaks of violation of the Bye Laws framed by the Govt. for sanction of plans for construction.

PSGA of 2011 framed by Govt. also fixed time frame for the departments to do the jobs of peoples. Had some officer bothered to verify that whether the officials under their administrative control are complying these orders or not but who bothers? There are lot of examples of violations with CTN of different departments of RTI & PSGA of 2011 & which had been publicized in previous editions but no boy acted speaks that nobody bothers & orders passed are just to make the innocents a fool.

Regarding Chief Minister Grievance cell it has been noticed by the CTN false information has been provided by the departments& site of the cell speaks that grievance resolved. One example is information provided by JDA vide No.JDA/Dy.secy/No/88-89 dated 25.02.2015 in complaint No. 53062 reads as “The case was rejected earlier now the applicant has furnished revised drawings as per Master plan on 21.02.2015. The case is being placed in the ensuing BOCA meeting” After that plan was malafiedly sent for UTEIC, NOC’s, which don’t fall under rules of UTEIC order dated 14.08.2001& despite getting all UTEIC, NOC’s which was an illegal condition put on the applicant, the said plan is sinking its breath for NOC from Divisional Commissioner’s office for its outcome. PSGA of 2011 is overruled is a live example of this case.

It is pertinent to mention here that as per reply to the application of the same applicant under RTI Act, the information provided by the Town Planning Organization, Jammu a communication of Chief Town Planner, Jammu addressed to Divisional Commissioner, Jammu, who is the chairman of UTEIC, which reads as under:-

Since there is variation in land title as per communication of revenue department, JDA & submitted drawings, the proposal for construction of commercial hall cannot be recommended for approval” It is a matter of great concern to write here that he himself commented in the same communication that AC(R) Samba has issued NOC for 2k 4 Marla land& the plan submitted is for the lesser of 1k 19 Marla with prescribed setbacks than how he is writing in violation is no doubt a serious matter to be enquired.

It is clear from the communication of AC(R) Samba as “Further, the land measuring 02 K-04 Marla is a private land & the land use is governed by Jammu Master Plan of 2021” vide No. DCS/SQ/14-15/1057 dated 20.02.2015 but then also big bosses are harassing the applicant by this way or the other needed to be enquired as there is mix land use is permissible under Master Plan 2021.

It was a news for STP, JDA when he contacted that he is not aware of the communication of CTP, TPO, Jammu vide No. CTP/BPC/TAC/2015-16/72-74 dated 12.08.2015 which is addressed to STP, JDA, which the CTP sent to the applicant through RTI on 01.09.2015 through special messenger. The letter of CTP again speaks of his intelligence& vested interests to delay the case which reads as “As per building plan submitted, the total plot area is 1k-19Marla, whereas as per the revenue papers plot area is 2k-4marla” It is as such requested that the applicant may be asked to submit correct building drawing as per the revenue papers/bye laws enabling this office to proceed further in the matter. It is not understood as he himself says that revenue papers are in the name of the applicant & what more he wants.

It is very shocking to comment here that plan already submitted is as per the Municipal bye lawsof 2011 & for which, STP, JDA/JMC had already issued their NOC as per Municipal Bye Laws then what more the said big boss CTP, TPO, Jammu wants.It is also a matter of great concern to write here that the said CTP, TPO, Jammu had forwarded the same plan of 1K-19M for NOC to all the UTEIC members for which NOC’s were issued & now again he initiated a new story for the reasons known to him.

It is a matter of great concern to write here that again more than six months exhausted, after the NOC of AC(R) Samba, However the said case in the JDA since 01.05.2013 & the said permission is in air till now as no outcome. Every time new conditions imposed to delay the matter. If this is the implementation of PSGA of 2011, CM’s grievance cell & Municipal Bye Laws of 2011 than what will happen if these Acts/Bye Laws are withdrawn by the Govt. which are seems to be an eye wash as this case speaks of.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


   Popular News

Top